Affirmative action

Ultimately, America can either have "equity," as modern wokesters use the term, or it can have equality—real moral and legal equality under the rule of law.

The Supreme Court decision handed down Thursday involving two universities has drawn both strong praise and criticism.

Supreme Court Justices wrote in their opinion that race-based admissions are permitted "only within the confines of narrow restrictions."

"We cannot let this decision be the last word," the president told reporters, while the Trump campaign said, "This is a great day for America."

The conservative pundit said the Court's decision will remove "the bigotry of low expectations" against Black students.

"The worst thing about affirmative action is that it created a Clarence Thomas who benefited from the program," NAACP President Derrick Johnson said.

George Floyd's murder unleashed global calls for racial justice. Millions marched against racism in America. Today, six rightwing Justices made things worse.

The biggest problem with affirmative action is that it is anti-equality. While the intentions were good, it promotes a different set of standards based on race.

The Supreme Court's two Black justices found themselves on opposite sides of the court's opinion in two high-stakes affirmative action cases.

Two affirmative action cases at Harvard and the University of North Carolina led to this major decision.

Rulings on cases involving affirmative action, student debt forgiveness, religion, free speech, LGBTQ+ rights and elections are still to come.

Only two June dates are on the Court's calendar, and with the term expected to wrap up in the next few weeks, four major cases remain to be decided

If diversity is so important for freedom of thought, why then are students and administrators shutting down debates in the name of diversity?

President Joe Biden can act to protect affirmative action and advance racial equity now.

The Supreme Court's likely ban on race as a consideration in college admissions is also expected to impact hiring, government contracts, financial aid—and more.

The best reason to end affirmative action is this: It doesn't work.

The Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments this week in two cases that will determine the future of affirmative action in college admissions.

Radio ads being played in the South days before the midterm elections are asking, "When did racism against white people become OK?"

The Supreme Court will hear arguments from two cases regarding affirmative action in college admissions.

Throughout their history, Yale and other elite, "white only" colleges and professional schools across the country did not admit Black people. However, in the 1960's, to comply with federal law, those white-only colleges took "affirmative action" to address their history of racial segregation.

Race-conscious admission, once seen as a tool for combatting racial bias, now provokes it.

"Principles don't vacillate."

The Supreme Court case could fundamentally alter college admissions policies.

Later this term, the Court will decide whether Harvard and the University of North Carolina illegally discriminated against academically qualified applicants.

He also indicated his support for Judge J. Michelle Childs, from his own state of South Carolina.

"[W]e will be told that noting that this is definitionally affirmative action and race discrimination is itself racist," commentator Ben Shapiro said.

President Biden said he would appoint the first Black woman to the Supreme Court—would this affect the upcoming case regarding the fate of Affirmative Action?

The judge said that even 70 years after the college's first Black students were admitted, they still experience isolation and stereotypes.

Asian-Americans might not yet realize that, by and large, one political party has a structural interest and ideological compulsion to racially discriminate against them.

The goal of those pushing reparations is not to heal the wounds of the past, but to leverage them in perpetuity in order to punish their enemies.